Ban lifted: Perplexity's AI agent browses and buys on Amazon again
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the injunction that had kept Comet off Amazon's storefront since March — Comet being Perplexity's agentic browser, where the AI walks the sites and clicks the buttons for the user. The court's logic is simple: it is the shopper who arrives at the site, and the AI is just a tool in their hands.
- Case No. 26-1444 (No. 3:25-cv-09514-MMC below, Northern District of California). The decision came down on August 4, 2026, in an opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith Jr.
- Amazon built its case on two statutes: the CFAA — the US law on unauthorised access to someone else's computers — and California's CDAFA, which covers the same ground. The court held Amazon was unlikely to win on either: the user is the one visiting the site, and the AI assistant is only a tool in their hands.
- The remaining factors — likely harm, the balance of the parties' interests, the public interest — the panel also counted for Perplexity. The injunction is vacated and the case goes back to the district court.
- Amazon filed in November 2025 and pleaded only two grounds, CFAA and CDAFA. The district court granted the injunction on March 9, 2026. The appeals court noted there is almost no case law on who answers for an AI agent's actions, and deliberately kept its ruling narrow.